Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115638›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting pro-environmental behavioral intention using interpretable machine learning.

Jing Li, Meng Liu, Meng Zhang, Zhiling Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiSchool of Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China. janelwz0909@163.com.
Meng LiuSchool of Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.
Meng ZhangSchool of Business Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zhiling WangDepartment of Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

Young Teachers Research Cultivation Project of School of Management, Tianjin University of Commerce GL2025002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employs machine learning techniques to investigate the determinants of pro-environmental behavioral intention (PEBI) using the survey data from the 2021 wave of the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS). By comparing the predictive performance of nine prevalent machine learning algorithms, the results show that the Random Forest model achieves the highest predictive accuracy in predicting PEBI. Furthermore, we develop an interpretable model based on the Random Forest and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis to examine the relative importance of 20 key predictors. The findings reveal that environmental concern is the most influential factor and is positively related to individual PEBI, followed by environmental attitude, connection to nature, environmental knowledge, government performance perception, and environmental responsibility. Additionally, we also examine the heterogeneity across different subsamples and explore interaction effects between key variables. Overall, this study adds novel knowledge to environmental sustainability literature by employing machine learning methods to predict the influencing factors of PEBI.

Indexed as

EnvironmentIntentionMachine LearningAlgorithmsChinaHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSurveys and QuestionnairesCGSSDeterminant modelMachine learningPro-environmental behavioral intention

Identifiers

PMID42115638
PMCPMC13350094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.