ArticleNature communications2026
Integrating multiplexing into confineable gene drives effectively overrides resistance in Anopheles stephensi.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering resilient gene drives for sustainable malaria control by predicting, testing and overcoming target site resistance in Anopheles gambiae.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Advances in CRISPR gene drives for mosquito population control.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Strategies to improve the efficiency of homing gene drives with multiplexed gRNAs.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anopheles stephensi is a major malaria vector mainly present in southern Asia and the Arabian Peninsula. Since 2012 it has invaded several countries of eastern Africa, stimulating urgent efforts to develop more efficient strategies for vector control such as CRISPR/Cas9-based homing gene drives. Target site resistance due to end-joining repair is a significant challenge to the deployment of these systems. The use of multiple sgRNAs has the potential to solve this issue. Here we perform experimental crosses to assess the homing and cutting efficiency of both classical (e.g. four adjacent sgRNAs all in one construct) and additive (e.g. separate constructs each expressing a single sgRNA) multiplexing strategies targeting the cardinal locus, in the presence and absence of a resistance allele. We find resistance alleles at one sgRNA target site can be mitigated by the presence of the additional sgRNAs with either strategy, and do not significantly reduce the homing efficiency for either strategy, validating their effectiveness. Further modelling using parameters derived from the strains generated indicates that while both strategies can overcome resistance allele formation, the fitness of the drive-carrying alleles is a critical factor in determining the overall performance and persistence of a split drive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.