ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Critical to Quality Assessment Methodology: An Adaptable Clinical Trial Risk Management and Quality Assurance Approach for Quality Functions in Pharmaceutical Companies, Developed by the Inter-Company IMPALA Consortium.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trial regulations recommend a dynamic and risk-based approach to the quality management strategy for a medicinal product development program. Sponsor companies are required to identify factors that are critical to quality, to perform ongoing evaluation of the changing risks and quality status in clinical trials and adapt their quality strategy accordingly. The Inter-Company Quality Analytics (IMPALA) not for profit consortium supports the shift towards dynamic quality management of clinical trials by providing publicly available data analytics packages to measure changing risks to patient safety and data reliability. The Critical to Quality Assessment Methodology is the latest initiative developed by the IMPALA consortium in support of dynamic quality assurance and risk management. This paper describes the methodology, which is an iterative process conducted throughout a clinical trial, beginning with risk factor identification and assessment, and development of the initial quality strategy based on this evaluation. It continues with the generation of quality evidence through the execution of a variety of activities, including quality assurance audits, process compliance monitoring, real-time study surveillance activities, etc., utilizing both traditional and analytical methods. From there quality conclusions are determined and documented in the Critical to Quality Assessment Report (CAR). These steps are executed on a continuous basis throughout the development of a medicinal product across all clinical trials and the CAR serves as a pivotal knowledge management tool, disclosing Good Clinical Practice compliance conclusions for stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.