Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115567›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Critical to Quality Assessment Methodology: An Adaptable Clinical Trial Risk Management and Quality Assurance Approach for Quality Functions in Pharmaceutical Companies, Developed by the Inter-Company IMPALA Consortium.

Kiernan Trevett, Jennifer Emerson, Paula Walker, Timothé Ménard, Mariza Koukounari, Louise Anderson, Heike Barlow, Jamie Bridges, IMPALA (Inter coMPany quALity Analytics) consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kiernan TrevettGenentech, A Member of the Roche Company, South San Francisco, 94080, USA. trevettk@gene.com.
Jennifer EmersonBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, 88397, Biberach an Der Riss, Germany.
Paula WalkerRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1TW, UK.
Timothé MénardF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Mariza KoukounariBristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH, UK.
Louise AndersonBayer Plc, Reading, RG2 6AD, UK.
Heike BarlowBayer Plc, Reading, RG2 6AD, UK.
Jamie BridgesMerck & Co Inc., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
IMPALA (Inter coMPany quALity Analytics) consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trial regulations recommend a dynamic and risk-based approach to the quality management strategy for a medicinal product development program. Sponsor companies are required to identify factors that are critical to quality, to perform ongoing evaluation of the changing risks and quality status in clinical trials and adapt their quality strategy accordingly. The Inter-Company Quality Analytics (IMPALA) not for profit consortium supports the shift towards dynamic quality management of clinical trials by providing publicly available data analytics packages to measure changing risks to patient safety and data reliability. The Critical to Quality Assessment Methodology is the latest initiative developed by the IMPALA consortium in support of dynamic quality assurance and risk management. This paper describes the methodology, which is an iterative process conducted throughout a clinical trial, beginning with risk factor identification and assessment, and development of the initial quality strategy based on this evaluation. It continues with the generation of quality evidence through the execution of a variety of activities, including quality assurance audits, process compliance monitoring, real-time study surveillance activities, etc., utilizing both traditional and analytical methods. From there quality conclusions are determined and documented in the Critical to Quality Assessment Report (CAR). These steps are executed on a continuous basis throughout the development of a medicinal product across all clinical trials and the CAR serves as a pivotal knowledge management tool, disclosing Good Clinical Practice compliance conclusions for stakeholders.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug IndustryQuality Assurance, Health CareRisk ManagementHumansQuality ControlClinical trialsCritical to qualityCritical to Quality (CtQ)Data analyticsGood Clinical Practice (GCP)Quality assuranceRisk-based quality management

Identifiers

PMID42115567
PMCPMC13525933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.