Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115506›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026

Clinical profile and management outcomes of small renal masses: a collaborative multi-institutional Indian study led by the society of genitourinary oncologists.

Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Sanjai Addla, Ginil Kumar Pooleri, S K Raghunath, Ashwin Tamhankar, Gopal Sharma, Gagan Gautam, Amitabh Singh, Rupesh Shah, Sudhir Rawal and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deerush Kannan SakthivelApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India. deerush92@gmail.com.
Sanjai AddlaApollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Ginil Kumar PooleriDepartment of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India.
S K RaghunathDepartment of Urology, HCG Hospitals, Bengaluru, India.
Ashwin TamhankarApollo Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
Gopal Sharma, New Delhi, India.
Gagan GautamUrologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Amitabh SinghMedical Director and Chief of Genitourinary Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Rupesh ShahIcon Hospitals, Ahmedabad, India.
Sudhir RawalMedical Director and Chief of Genitourinary Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Narasimhan RagavanApollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall renal masses (SRMs), defined as renal tumors < 4 cm, are increasingly detected due to the widespread use of imaging modalities. Data from India regarding the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SRMs remain limited. This multi-institutional study led by the Society of Genitourinary Oncologists aims to delineate the demographic, radiological, and pathological profiles of SRMs in the Indian population and evaluate management outcomes following partial nephrectomy.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted across multiple tertiary care centers in India from January 2013 to December 2022. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with SRMs undergoing partial nephrectomy were included. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, radiology (including RENAL nephrometry score), intraoperative factors, postoperative outcomes, and histopathology were analyzed. Statistical associations between renal scores, BMI, tumor stage, and histologic type were assessed.

resultsA total of 432 patients were analyzed, with a male predominance (76.6%) and mean age of 51.8 ± 12.9 years. Most SRMs (80.3%) were incidentally detected. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy was performed in 85% of cases, with a mean operative time of 228.7 ± 91.8 min and clamp time of 25.5 ± 9.1 min. The overall complication rate was 7%. Clear cell RCC was the most common histology (71.1%), while benign lesions accounted for 11.6%. Positive margins were seen in 1.4% of cases. BMI correlated significantly with renal complexity (p = 0.010). At a median follow-up of 36 months, recurrence occurred in 0.9% of patients. Female patients under 45 years had a higher incidence of benign pathology (34.1%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThis first large-scale Indian collaborative study highlights unique epidemiologic and pathologic trends in SRMs, including lower benign histology rates and higher complexity in obese patients. Robotic partial nephrectomy demonstrated favorable perioperative and oncologic outcomes. The findings support individualized management strategies and emphasize the need for structured follow-up protocols in the Indian setting.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyAdultAgedFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenIndiaPartial nephrectomyRenal cell carcinomaRENAL nephrometry scoreRobotic surgerySmall renal mass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.