ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Comparison of rotary NiTi files with ultrasonic irrigation and manual K-files with syringe irrigation in primary molar pulpectomy: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePulpectomy is the standard treatment for irreversibly inflamed or infected primary molars. It depends on effective root canal cleaning and shaping. Traditional manual preparation and irrigation techniques face challenges when dealing with complex root canal systems in primary teeth. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two rotary nickel-titanium file systems with distinct tapers (M3 and S3) combined with ultrasonic irrigation, compared to conventional manual K-files and syringe irrigation,inpulpectomy for primary molars. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study included patients aged 4- to 9-year who underwent RCT for mandibular primary molars at the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Participants were categorized into three groups based on the instrumentation and irrigation protocol used: M3 rotary files with ultrasonic irrigation (n=98), S3 rotary files with ultrasonic irrigation (n=84), and manual K-files with syringe irrigation (n=78). Instrumentation time was measured using a digital stopwatch. Obturation quality was radiographically classified as optimal, underfilled, or overfilled. Postoperative pain was assessed at 24-, 48-, and 72 h using the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Clinical and radiographic outcomes at the 12-month follow-up were categorized as success, uncertain, or failure.
resultsThe M3 rotary group showed the shortest instrumentation time (210.45 ± 6.85 s) and the highest rate of optimal obturation (87.1%), significantly outperforming the S3 and manual file groups (P<0.05). Both rotary systems led to significantly lower pain scores at 24 and 48 hours compared to manual instrumentation (P<0.01). No significant differences were observed in pain at 72 hours or in 12-month therapeutic success rates among the groups (P>0.05).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that combining modern NiTi rotary instrumentation (specifically the 0.04 tapered M3 system) with ultrasonic irrigation significantly outperforms conventional manual techniques in operative efficiency, obturation quality, and postoperative pain control. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The integration of NiTi and ultrasound translates into a clinically superior, patient-beneficial protocol for primary teeth pulp therapy, optimizing procedural experience without compromising therapeutic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.