Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115492›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Segmentation and 3D Visualization of Spinal Motion Segments from MSCT Images Using a 3D U‑Net Framework.

Antor Mahamudul Hashan, Khlebnikov Nikolai Alexandrovich, Denis Protasov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antor Mahamudul HashanDepartment of Intelligent Information Technologies, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia. hashan.antor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-9245
Khlebnikov Nikolai AlexandrovichDepartment of Intelligent Information Technologies, Institute of Fundamental Education, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Denis ProtasovDepartment of Intelligent Information Technologies, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5951-2504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of spinal motion segments from multi‑slice computed tomography (MSCT) images is essential for clinical evaluation and pre‑operative planning. This study presents a fully automated framework that combines a three‑dimensional U‑Net for MSCT segmentation, a watershed‑based algorithm for vertebra‑wise separation, and a marching cubes pipeline for three‑dimensional reconstruction. A dataset of anonymized lumbar‑spine MSCT scans from 50 male patients was used for model development. The proposed 3D U‑Net achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.96, a Jaccard Index of 0.93, a Hausdorff distance of 3.1 mm, a precision of 0.97, and a recall of 0.95, outperforming Dense‑U‑Net and nnU‑Net baselines trained on the same data. Vertebra‑separation performance reached a 95.8% success rate with a 3.4% mis‑segmentation rate and a mean boundary deviation of 1.9 mm. An ablation study confirmed that posterior‑arch removal, ROI detection, watershed separation, and data augmentation each contributed substantially to overall accuracy. A graphical user interface was developed to enable interactive inspection, manipulation, and export of patient‑specific spinal motion‑segment models. The system provides a reliable and clinically practical solution for MSCT‑based segmentation and 3D visualization, supporting improved surgical planning and potential integration into orthopedic workflow pipelines. Future work will extend the framework to multi‑center datasets and dynamic (4D) motion analysis.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionArthroplasty surgerySpinal motion segmentVertebral segmentationWatershed algorithm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.