Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115483›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

Floral induction in response to environmental cues: extending a century of progress.

George Coupland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George CouplandDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany. coupland@mpipz.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6988-4172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionGreat progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of floral induction based on physiology and molecular genetics, whereas recent research suggests that future developments will come from protein biochemistry, genomics, imaging, and mathematical modeling. During the twentieth century, plant physiologists showed how the developmental transition from vegetative growth to flowering is controlled by environmental cues, such as day length and temperature. They defined a number of interesting questions such as the identity of the signal induced in response to day length in leaves that is translocated to the shoot meristem to induce flowering, and the mechanism by which plants sense and remember exposure to winter temperatures. Application of molecular-genetics approaches from the 1990s identified regulatory proteins and small RNAs that control these responses, first in Arabidopsis and later in several crops. These advances identified a series of new questions. In this Perspective article, I highlight some of these issues and select some recent papers that show how protein biochemistry, genomics, imaging, and mathematical modeling address these questions, and will in turn improve our understanding of the mechanisms of floral induction.

Indexed as

FlowersArabidopsisEnvironmentFlorigenGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhotoperiodPlant ProteinsVernalizationFlorigenPlant ProteinsFlorigenFlowering regulatorsQuantitative modelsTranscription factorsVernalization

Identifiers

PMID42115483
PMCPMC13161338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.