SynthesisAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Biopsy of Pineal Tumors: Endoscopy or Stereotaxic or Neuronavigation Guided?
Synthesis in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and diagnostic yield of three biopsy approaches for pineal tumors: endoscopy-, stereotaxic-, and neuronavigation-guided techniques.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, encompassing relevant studies published between 1973 and 2023. Data were collected on biopsy success rates, complications, diagnostic accuracy, and procedural variables.
resultsA total of 93 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 1798 patients. We did not find any article considering only neuronavigation. This technique was always associated with the endoscopic or the stereotactic way, so we did not present isolated results. The overall biopsy success rates were comparable for both techniques, ranging from 25% to 100% (We note that three studies reported very low success rates (25%-50%) compared with the remaining 45 studies, which reported success rates ranging from 81.1% to 100%. These studies are discussed, along with our interpretation of these exceptions: (1) Kraichoke et al. (Am J Surg Pathol 12(9):655-660, 1988), success rate = 25% (n = 4); this result is probably due to the early stage of adoption of the technique. (2) Cunliffe et al. (J Neurooncol 93(2):269-274, 2009), success rate = 50% (n = 1); a second biopsy was performed for the same patient because the first one only provides hemorrhagic tissue fragments. (3) Kim et al. (Childs Nerv Syst 39(9):2367-2375, 2023), success rate = 50% (n = 2); one endoscopic procedure had to be stopped because of hemorrhage resulting in poor visualization.). However, endoscopic biopsies demonstrated a slightly lower diagnostic yield (87%) compared to stereotaxic-guided techniques (94.6%). Complication rates were also similar, with minor complications occurring in 4.3%-14.9% of cases and major complications in 0.5%-1.6%.
conclusionEndoscopic-, stereotaxic-, and neuronavigation-guided biopsy techniques exhibit similar efficacy and safety profiles for sampling pineal tumors. Endoscopy may offer a significant advantage due to the possibility to perform an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in the same surgical time, but the choice of technique should consider individual patient factors, tumor characteristics, and surgeon expertise. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and optimize biopsy strategies for pineal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42115459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.