ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026
Hydrocephalus Secondary to Pineal Region Lesions.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHydrocephalus is a common complication associated with pineal lesions, including tumors and cysts. This structured abstract aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and management strategies for hydrocephalus in the context of pineal lesions.
methodsA review of relevant literature was conducted to gather current insights into hydrocephalus secondary to pineal lesions. PubMed, Google Scholar, and academic databases were searched for articles published between 2014 and 2024. Keywords included "hydrocephalus," "pineal lesion," "pineal tumor," "cyst," "diagnosis," "treatment," and "management."
resultsPineal lesions, by obstructing CSF pathways, often lead to hydrocephalus due to impaired CSF flow dynamics. Neuroimaging, particularly MRI and CT scans, plays a pivotal role in diagnosing both the pineal lesion and associated hydrocephalus. Treatment strategies for hydrocephalus in pineal lesions include surgical interventions such as endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, and tumor resection. Nonsurgical options, including medical therapy and observation, may also be considered depending on the patient's clinical status and lesion characteristics.
conclusionHydrocephalus in pineal lesions presents a complex clinical scenario requiring a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management. Early diagnosis, accurate characterization of the lesion and associated hydrocephalus, and timely intervention are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to refine treatment algorithms and enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of hydrocephalus in pineal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42115458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.