Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115455›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2026

Imaging of Pineal Region Masses.

Marc Hermier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc HermierDepartment of Neuroradiology, P. Wertheimer Neurological and Neurosurgical Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron Cedex, France. marc.hermier@chu-lyon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter provides a literature review of the role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of pineal tumors and cysts and other masses of the pineal region. Several types of lesions are illustrated. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic workup, surgical planning, and follow-up. Computerized tomography plays a role in the emergency setting, owing to its wide availability. It is able to detect obstructive hydrocephalus, mass calcification, and hemorrhage. Magnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice for tumor characterization and pretherapeutic planning. Pineal cysts are common, and most cases do not require imaging follow-up. However, atypical findings may give diagnostic problems with partially cystic tumors. High-resolution sequences, multiplanar views, and contrast injection are needed. Advanced sequences including diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, susceptibility-weighted imaging, spectroscopy, and flow sensitive sequences may provide useful information. Spine MRI is mandatory whenever a malignant pineal tumor is suspected. Preoperative imaging should also include careful analysis of vascular anatomy, and CTA or MRA has reduced the need for invasive angiography. Unfortunately, in many cases imaging findings are still not specific of a tumor type, and then definitive diagnosis relies on serum or cerebrospinal fluid tumor markers and histological and immunohistochemical analyses.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsPineal GlandPinealomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputerized tomographyImagingMagnetic resonance imagingPineal region massesPineal tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.