Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115402›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC.

McKenzie P Hagen, Céline Provins, Eilidh MacNicol, Jamie K Li, Teresa Gomez, Mélanie Garcia, Saren H Seeley, Jon Haitz Legarreta, Martin Norgaard, Patrick G Bissett and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

McKenzie P HagenDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. mphagen@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-8189
Céline ProvinsDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-9629
Eilidh MacNicolDepartment of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-7012
Jamie K LiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Teresa GomezDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-4430
Mélanie GarciaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Saren H SeeleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-8512
Jon Haitz LegarretaDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-1396
Martin NorgaardDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrick G BissettDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ariel RokemDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-1985
Oscar EstebanDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. phd@oscaresteban.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-6191

Funding

OpenNeuro: An open archive for analysis and sharing of BRAIN Initiative dataR24MH117179 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Russell A Poldrack · 2018 to 2026
$11.6M
Training the next generation of clinical neuroscientistsT32MH122394 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rene S. Kahn, ANTONIA S NEW · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
NIPreps: integrating neuroimaging preprocessing workflows across modalities, populations, and speciesRF1MH121867 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A, ROKEM, ARIEL SHALOM · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
Dynamic functional connectivity as a neurobiological mechanism of adaptation in widowed older adultsF31AG062067 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SEELEY, SAREN H · 2019 to 2019
$44k
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) #185872U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0023112U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R24MH117179U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) RF1MH121867U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) T32MH122394U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) F31AG062067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality control (QC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data before preprocessing is fundamental, because substandard data are known to introduce additional variability in the form of noise to subsequent analyses. This can result in spurious results of a false effect or the obstruction of a true effect. Consequently, there is a need for a reliable and robust method to identify subpar images, given pre-specified exclusion criteria. Here, we describe how to carry out the visual assessment of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, functional and diffusion MRI scans of the human brain with visual reports generated by MRIQC ( https://mriqc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ ). We provide guidance and instructions for using the MRIQC software on all the images of the input dataset using typical research settings (i.e., a high-performance computing cluster). This includes installing MRIQC, configuring datasets (30-45 min active, plus 10-15 min of compute time per scan) and executing MRIQC (10-15 min compute time per scan). We then describe how to screen the visual reports generated with MRIQC to identify artifacts and potential quality issues and annotate the latter with the 'rating widget', a utility that enables rapid annotation and minimizes bookkeeping errors (1-5 min per participant). Integrating proper QC checks on the unprocessed data is fundamental to producing reliable statistical results and crucial to identifying faults in the scanning settings, preempting the acquisition of large datasets with persistent artifacts that should have been addressed as they emerged.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansQuality ControlSoftware

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.