ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Augmented reality and 3D visualization integrated with magnetic-assisted robotic procedures: first clinical cases using combined cutting-edge technologies.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent minimally invasive surgery techniques face persistent challenges: limited depth perception, assistant-dependent retraction, and added invasiveness from multiple ports. We present the first clinical experience combining three novel technologies: Magnetic-Assisted Robotic Surgery (MARS), 3D visualization, and augmented reality (AR).
methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent reduced-port laparoscopic surgery using the MARS system with Meta Quest 3 AR headset and EinsteinVision 3D camera in October 2024. Procedures included cholecystectomy (n = 4), oophorectomies (n = 2), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2), combined cholecystectomy with sleeve gastrectomy (n = 1), and hiatal hernia repair (n = 1).
resultsMedian operative time was 108 min (range: 44-218 min). Each procedure required at least one fewer port than traditional approaches. No complications occurred, and there were no readmissions or protocol deviations within 30 days. Surgeons reported greatly improved visualization compared with standard laparoscopy, and no device malfunctions were encountered.
conclusionIntegrating MARS, 3D visualization, and AR proved feasible and safe across multiple surgical specialties. This platform enhanced visualization and reduced invasiveness while maintaining efficiency and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.