Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115343›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

Rethinking hierarchy: the auditory system as an integrated cortical-subcortical network.

Michael Lohse, Ben D B Willmore, Andrew J King

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael Lohse *Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-0704
Ben D B Willmore *Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-7572
Andrew J KingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. andrew.king@dpag.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-7179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian sensory systems are traditionally viewed as hierarchical pathways in which subcortical nuclei relay signals from peripheral receptors to the cortex, where sensory information is contextualized for perception and behaviour. However, the auditory pathway contains an unusually large number of anatomically complex, recurrently connected subcortical nuclei that transmit heavily pre-processed information to the cortex. Emerging evidence shows that the auditory system functions as an integrated cortical-subcortical network that is heavily influenced by non-auditory inputs and extensive bidirectional connectivity at nearly all levels. Subcortical structures are not passive relays but active participants in computations traditionally attributed to cortex, including adaptive coding of sound statistics, multisensory integration, encoding of behavioural relevance and action, and learning. Although certain transformations occur hierarchically - such as brainstem spatial processing - sensitivity to most sound features forms a continuum across the auditory pathway, with modulation by other sensory, motor and cognitive systems at every stage. The degree of subcortical pre-processing may explain why emergent cortical properties are harder to identify in audition than in vision, in which cortical and subcortical receptive field properties are more distinct. This distributed circuit organization opens new avenues for understanding how the brain constructs perception and guides behaviour from the fusion of sensory evidence and contextual knowledge.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionNerve NetAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.