ArticleScientific reports2026
Multidimensional balance assessment and machine learning gait stability prediction in elderly women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and validate a comprehensive balance assessment scale specifically designed for elderly women and construct predictive models for gait stability outcomes using machine learning approaches. A total of 276 community-dwelling elderly women aged 60-80 years participated in this study. A multidimensional balance assessment scale was developed through expert consultation and psychometric evaluation. Three-dimensional gait analysis was conducted to collect biomechanical parameters. Multiple machine learning algorithms including random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting were employed to construct gait stability prediction models using balance assessment scores, functional reach distance, single-leg stance duration, tandem walking performance, and demographic variables as predictor inputs. The 12-item balance assessment scale demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.89, ICC = 0.88) and validity (CVI = 0.92). Moderate to moderately strong correlations were found between balance scores and gait parameters (r = 0.35-0.67). The ensemble machine learning model achieved superior predictive performance (R² = 0.71, AUC = 0.91) for gait stability classification. External validation confirmed adequate generalization capability (R² = 0.66, indicating a large effect size per Cohen
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.