Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115325›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Human-AI co-creation among Gen Z to build knowledge and learning effectiveness.

Dhanya Pramod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dhanya PramodSymbiosis Centre for Information Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. dhanya@scit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of human-AI co-creation on learning effectiveness and to assess the intermediary role of Engagement, Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Co-creation. A survey instrument was employed in this empirical study, designed by combining Self-Determination Theory, Connectivism, and Constructivism. The data was collected through a questionnaire from 415 Gen Z adults. PLS-SEM technique was used to carry out quantitative analysis. The results pointed out a significant association between students' psychological need satisfaction and Cognitive Engagement, with the effect of Perceived Autonomy and Perceived Competence evenly balanced, while Perceived Relatedness wielded a stronger influence on Cognitive Engagement. The findings also unveiled that AI interaction quality had a better influence on Cognitive engagement compared to Trust in AI and perceived agency of AI. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a significant positive impact of Cognitive Engagement on the development of thinking skills. This consequently influenced knowledge co-creation, ultimately leading to enhanced learning effectiveness. This study has implications for educational setups and training organizations to adopt Gen AI for co-creation, and guides policymakers in designing relevant policies to responsibly use Gen AI for co-creation.

Indexed as

KnowledgeLearningAdultCognitionFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesThinkingYoung AdultConnectivismConstructivismCritical thinking skillsGenerative AIHuman–AI co-creationLearning effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID42115325
PMCPMC13347037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.