ArticleScientific reports2026
Human-AI co-creation among Gen Z to build knowledge and learning effectiveness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of human-AI co-creation on learning effectiveness and to assess the intermediary role of Engagement, Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Co-creation. A survey instrument was employed in this empirical study, designed by combining Self-Determination Theory, Connectivism, and Constructivism. The data was collected through a questionnaire from 415 Gen Z adults. PLS-SEM technique was used to carry out quantitative analysis. The results pointed out a significant association between students' psychological need satisfaction and Cognitive Engagement, with the effect of Perceived Autonomy and Perceived Competence evenly balanced, while Perceived Relatedness wielded a stronger influence on Cognitive Engagement. The findings also unveiled that AI interaction quality had a better influence on Cognitive engagement compared to Trust in AI and perceived agency of AI. Furthermore, the results demonstrated a significant positive impact of Cognitive Engagement on the development of thinking skills. This consequently influenced knowledge co-creation, ultimately leading to enhanced learning effectiveness. This study has implications for educational setups and training organizations to adopt Gen AI for co-creation, and guides policymakers in designing relevant policies to responsibly use Gen AI for co-creation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.