Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115314›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2026

Optimal surgical management of patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Mehran Rahimi, June He, Kunal D Kotkar, Muhammad F Masood, Amit A Pawale, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Takashi Murashita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehran RahimiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
June HeDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Kunal D KotkarDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Muhammad F MasoodDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Amit A PawaleDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Tsuyoshi KanekoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Takashi MurashitaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA. takashi@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 30%) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) face heightened peri-operative risk. Prophylactic mechanical circulatory support with the surgical Impella 5.5 pump may enhance hemodynamic stability, yet its clinical value remains uncertain. Here, we report our institutional experience in managing patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG. We retrospectively reviewed adults who underwent isolated elective or urgent CABG at a single center between January 2020 and July 2024. Patients supported with preoperative Impella 5.5 were excluded. Included patients had a preoperative LVEF ≤ 30%, without evidence of cardiogenic shock or need for inotropes prior to CABG. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Overall, we included 74 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 10 years who were predominantly male (85.1%). Twenty patients (27%) received prophylactic intraoperative Impella 5.5 support via axillary or ascending aortic graft. Fifty-four patients did not receive intraoperative Impella 5.5 support. Operative mortality was 1.4% in the entire cohort. Median ICU stay and hospital stay were 5.0 days and 19 days, respectively. The most common postoperative complication was atrial fibrillation (36.5%), followed by renal failure (5.4%), and pneumonia (5.4%). Two patients who did not receive intraoperative Impella 5.5, required rescue Impella 5.5 or CP post-operatively. This study showed that with appropriate patient selection, mortality rates in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG could be significantly reduced. Thus, selective, indication-driven deployment of Impella 5.5 rather than universal adoption appears warranted.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypassHeart-assist devicesLeft ventricular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID42115314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.