ArticleScientific reports2026
Determinants of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination among female medical practitioners in Punjab, India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and early detection through screening and vaccination can significantly reduce its burden. This study investigated the factors influencing cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination among doctors in Punjab, India. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey among 616 female doctors in Punjab, India. The survey assessed doctors' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, as well as their Barriers and influences. The data were analysed using the chi-square test, multivariable binary logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis Test. The study found varying levels of knowledge among different cadres of doctors, with gynaecologists exhibiting higher comprehensive knowledge scores than non-clinician doctors. Attitudes towards cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination differed significantly among the surveyed doctors, with non-clinician doctors showing more positive attitudes compared to gynaecologists. Doctors' professional cadre, age, marital status, practising area, length of practice, and parity were significantly associated with getting screened for cervical cancer. HPV vaccination was associated with doctors' professional cadre, religion, current practice area, and sexual activity status. The study highlights the importance of targeted interventions and awareness campaigns tailored to different healthcare provider groups, particularly gynaecologists and older doctors, to improve cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination rates. The study also emphasises the need for tailored educational programs to enhance awareness among all medical professionals, especially non-clinician doctors, to bridge knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.