Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep fusion explainable recommendation based on sentiment analysis and feature weighting.

Kechao Li, Zainura Idrus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kechao LiSchool of Computing Sciences, Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Zainura IdrusSchool of Computing Sciences, Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Malaysia. my472360924@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recommendation systems are crucial in helping users search for personalized information. However, the original ratings used by existing recommendation systems can't accurately represent users' true rating intentions, ignore sentiment attitudes, and lack explainability. To address this issue, the article proposes the recommendation of Sentiment Analysis and Feature Weighting (SAFW). This method uses BERT pre-trained review text to generate comment word vectors. Using Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network (BiRNN) to extract sentiment features of users towards items and generate sentiment classification labels to reduce the deviation between user ratings and their true sentiment tendencies. Decompose the sentiment score matrix and the original rating matrix into vectors, perform deep fusion of multi-level feature vectors, and model high-order interactions between users and items to improve the accuracy of recommendations. Calculate the weight of users' interest preferences for item features based on review frequency and sentiment score. On the premise of high recommendation accuracy, using the three features with the highest interest preference weight as the explanation for the recommendation makes it more persuasive.

Indexed as

Deep learningExplainabilityFeature vectorFeature weightRecommendation algorithmSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID42115283
PMCPMC13350866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.