ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep fusion explainable recommendation based on sentiment analysis and feature weighting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recommendation systems are crucial in helping users search for personalized information. However, the original ratings used by existing recommendation systems can't accurately represent users' true rating intentions, ignore sentiment attitudes, and lack explainability. To address this issue, the article proposes the recommendation of Sentiment Analysis and Feature Weighting (SAFW). This method uses BERT pre-trained review text to generate comment word vectors. Using Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network (BiRNN) to extract sentiment features of users towards items and generate sentiment classification labels to reduce the deviation between user ratings and their true sentiment tendencies. Decompose the sentiment score matrix and the original rating matrix into vectors, perform deep fusion of multi-level feature vectors, and model high-order interactions between users and items to improve the accuracy of recommendations. Calculate the weight of users' interest preferences for item features based on review frequency and sentiment score. On the premise of high recommendation accuracy, using the three features with the highest interest preference weight as the explanation for the recommendation makes it more persuasive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.