ArticleScientific reports2026
Photocatalytic removal of Cr(VI) using cobalt ferrite-coated recycled cigarette butts under visible light: optimization via response surface methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the efficiency of a photocatalytic process utilizing a cobalt ferrite nanocomposite coated on recycled cigarette butts for the removal of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) from aqueous environments under visible light. The variables under investigation were optimized using a entral composite design (CCD) within the framework of the response surface methodology (RSM). XRD, FTIR, SEM, and EDX mapping were employed to determine the structural, functional groups, morphology and compositional attributes of the synthesized nanocomposite. At the established optimal parameters (pH 2, 20 mg/L Cr(VI), 1.5 g/L catalyst dosage, and a reaction time of 120 min) the synthesized nanocomposite achieved a 95.49% photocatalytic reduction. Furthermore, the influence of environmental parameters, including purging gases, H₂O₂, organic compound types, various anions, radical scavengers, and catalyst recyclability, on the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) was examined under optimal conditions. The value and accuracy of the proposed model were statistically evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (R²) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Visible/CoFe₂O₄-RCBs system demonstrated superior performance in Cr(VI) removal and optimal electrical energy consumption compared to other visible-light processes, achieving an energy efficiency of 6.89 × 10⁻
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.