Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing groundwater vulnerability assessment framework under anthropogenic stressors.

Tarekegn Dejen Mengistu, Il-Moon Chung, Sun Woo Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarekegn Dejen MengistuDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Science & Technology, Daejeon, 34113, Korea.
Il-Moon ChungDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Science & Technology, Daejeon, 34113, Korea. imchung@kict.re.kr.
Sun Woo ChangDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Science & Technology, Daejeon, 34113, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 20260156-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquifer vulnerability assessment (AVA) is a critical tool for the protection of groundwater-dependent ecosystems, especially in regions under persistent anthropogenic stress. Yet conventional index-based methods often rely on static parameters that inadequately represent dynamic surface-groundwater interactions (SGWI) and evolving land use pressures. This study presents an enhanced AVA framework that integrates physically based SGWI simulations from a coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model with modified DRASTIC indices (DRASTIC, DRASTICL, and DRASTICLW), normalized using a spatially resolved Water Quality Index (WQI). The WQI served as an empirical proxy for contamination, strengthening the link between predicted vulnerability and observed groundwater quality. Key hydrogeological parameters are refined using calibrated SWAT-MODFLOW outputs to improve the representation of recharge, land-surface dynamics, and subsurface responses. The results show that moderate- to high-vulnerability zones dominate the catchment, particularly in cultivated lands and shallow aquifers. Areas with very high vulnerability, though limited, coincide with major water resources and industrial zones, indicating a practical need for targeted management interventions. Model evaluation using ROC analysis indicates improved discrimination performance from DRASTIC to DRASTICLW formulations. The integrated framework provides a physically consistent and empirically constrained approach for regional-scale vulnerability assessment, with applicability dependent on hydrogeological conditions and data availability. Comparative evaluations highlight notable shifts in vulnerability patterns when land use and water quality variables are included, confirming the influence of anthropogenic stressors. By integrating physically based hydrological modeling with empirical water quality data, this approach provides a transferable decision-support framework. It contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) and supports adaptive groundwater management in environmentally sensitive regions.

Identifiers

PMID42115256
PMCPMC13347071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.