Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115242›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Crowdsourcing enables robust cell annotation for breast cancer pathology.

Pascal Klöckner, Melis Erdal Cesur, Bart de Rooij, Zainab Ameziane, Idris Iritas, Rolf Harkes, Siamak Hajizadeh, Ibrahim Aloglu, Joyce Sanders, Marcos da Silva Guimaraes and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Pascal Klöckner *Computational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Melis Erdal Cesur *Computational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart de RooijComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zainab AmezianeComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Idris IritasComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rolf HarkesComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Siamak HajizadehChangeGamers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ibrahim AlogluUniversity of Health Sciences, Mehmet Akif Inan Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Türkiye.
Joyce SandersDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcos da Silva GuimaraesDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sybren Lodewijk MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rafael BidarraComputer Graphics and Visualization Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jelle Ten HoeveChangeGamers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens PelsChangeGamers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sara Pires OliveiraComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.oliveira@nki.nl.
Hugo Mark HorlingsComputational Pathology group, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.horlings@nki.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment (TME) contains important morphological and molecular cues that help determine prognosis and therapeutic responses. Deep learning models can assist pathologists in assessing such biomarkers. However, generating high-quality annotations for computational pathology remains a significant bottleneck due to the level of expertise and considerable time required for fine-grained labeling. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of using non-expert crowdsourcing for cell annotation in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) samples of breast cancer tissue. Unlike prior work, performance assessment was based on high-fidelity ground-truth labels derived from multiplexed immunofluorescence using CODEX data, allowing for accurate benchmarking of both experts and non-experts. We collected cell annotations from experts, semi-experts, and non-experts through Tilly, a gamified annotation application designed to train and engage users in identifying major cell types within the TME. Overall, our results show that non-expert crowdsourcing is a scalable and effective strategy for generating training data for the classification of major cell types in H&E images: tumor cells, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts. Moreover, combining large, crowdsourced datasets with smaller, high-quality subsets annotated using spatial proteomics may offer a practical annotation approach to develop more robust models while minimizing biases.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCrowdsourcingDeep LearningFemaleHumansTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42115242
PMCPMC13350771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.