ArticleScientific reports2026
Crowdsourcing enables robust cell annotation for breast cancer pathology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) contains important morphological and molecular cues that help determine prognosis and therapeutic responses. Deep learning models can assist pathologists in assessing such biomarkers. However, generating high-quality annotations for computational pathology remains a significant bottleneck due to the level of expertise and considerable time required for fine-grained labeling. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of using non-expert crowdsourcing for cell annotation in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) samples of breast cancer tissue. Unlike prior work, performance assessment was based on high-fidelity ground-truth labels derived from multiplexed immunofluorescence using CODEX data, allowing for accurate benchmarking of both experts and non-experts. We collected cell annotations from experts, semi-experts, and non-experts through Tilly, a gamified annotation application designed to train and engage users in identifying major cell types within the TME. Overall, our results show that non-expert crowdsourcing is a scalable and effective strategy for generating training data for the classification of major cell types in H&E images: tumor cells, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts. Moreover, combining large, crowdsourced datasets with smaller, high-quality subsets annotated using spatial proteomics may offer a practical annotation approach to develop more robust models while minimizing biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.