Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

AI-powered evaluation of dementia severity based on clinical data and visual scoring systems (MTA, ERICA, GCA) from MRI.

Lin Tun Naing, Alisa Kunapinun, Matthew N Dailey, Rungsiri Patanasantichai, Sittaya Buathong, Chadaporn Keatmanee, Jitsupa Wongsripuemtet, Chatchawan Rattanabannakit, Vorapun Senanarong, Mongkol Ekpanyapong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin Tun Naing *Artificial Intelligence (AI) Center, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Alisa Kunapinun *Artificial Intelligence (AI) Center, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Matthew N DaileyArtificial Intelligence (AI) Center, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Rungsiri PatanasantichaiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sittaya BuathongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Chadaporn KeatmaneeDepartment of Computer Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand.
Jitsupa WongsripuemtetDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Chatchawan RattanabannakitDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Vorapun SenanarongDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Mongkol EkpanyapongArtificial Intelligence (AI) Center, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Dittapong SongsaengDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. dsongsaeng@gmail.com.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand N34A660390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), is a growing concern in aging populations, with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) frequently progressing to AD. While existing studies often rely on comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations and assessments by neurologists and neuroradiologists, these approaches are not always feasible in routine or rural clinical practice. Current diagnostic methods rely on clinical assessments and MRI-based visual scoring systems such as MTA, ERICA, and GCA, requiring expert evaluation and leading to delays. This study presents an AI-based diagnostic framework utilizing deep learning models to predict visual scores and classify dementia stages using brain MRI and clinical measures such as TMSE and MoCA. Unlike prior methods that demand full expert oversight, our approach reduces reliance on specialized personnel by enabling AI-generated visual scores to support general radiologists and internists. ResNet18 was trained separately for MTA, ERICA, and GCA scoring, while DenseNet121 was applied for MRI-based dementia classification. Results indicate that models integrating AI-predicted Visual Scores with clinical data achieved up to 75.24% accuracy, outperforming MRI-only models (63.44%). Notably, the inclusion of MoCA unexpectedly reduced classification accuracy, suggesting potential biases in its application. Feature attribution using SHAP revealed that clinical inputs (MMSE, MoCA, age) dominated model decisions, while MRI scores played a greater role in AD classification. Age-stratified confusion matrices further uncovered forward-shifted misclassifications in younger patients, potentially indicating early disease sensitivity. By streamlining the diagnostic process and minimizing the need for licensed specialists, the AI system offers a promising tool for early dementia screening, particularly in areas with limited access to neurologists and radiologists, such as rural Thailand. Future studies will focus on refining model generalizability across diverse populations and improving prediction robustness in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseArtificial IntelligenceDementiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCognitive DysfunctionConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsMaleSeverity of Illness IndexAlzheimerDeep learningDementiaERICAGCAMTAVisual scoring system

Identifiers

PMID42115238
PMCPMC13350691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.