ArticleScientific reports2026
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative invasive lobular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with locally advanced, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (2010-2020), including patients with stage II/III ILC who underwent both chemotherapy and surgery. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Primary endpoints were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). Among 7,496 eligible patients, 851 received NACT and 6,645 received ACT. After IPTW adjustment, ACT was associated with significantly improved BCSS (HR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.59-2.45) and OS (HR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.63-2.38) in stage III ILC. Younger patients (< 50 years) with stage II disease also showed a survival advantage with ACT. No significant differences were observed in older stage II patients. For locally advanced HR+/HER2 - ILC, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with superior survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly in stage III disease and younger stage II patients. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the study's retrospective nature and inherent limitations. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from each treatment sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.