Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115224›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A thermodynamics-integrated physics-guided neural network for soil temperature forecasting.

Shengyi Wang, Jinlong Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shengyi WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, 130031, China.
Jinlong ZhuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, 130031, China. zhujinlong@ccsfu.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Changchun Normal University CSJJ2023013ZK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil temperature forecasting plays a key role in agriculture, hydrology, and climate modeling; however, existing deep learning models often show degraded performance in long-term prediction due to error accumulation, insufficient physical interpretability, and limited spatial generalization. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a Thermodynamic-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network (TE-PINN), a forecasting framework based on an LSTM backbone that integrates domain-specific physical knowledge through the Latent Thermodynamic Potential Inference (LTPI) and Multi-Pathway Physics-Guided Loss Integration (MPPGLI) modules. LTPI applies free-energy principles and dissipation constraints to characterize internal thermal dynamics, addressing the difficulty of LSTM in capturing long-range temporal dependencies. MPPGLI provides a multi-path physics-guided loss formulation that effectively narrows the discrepancy between predictions and observations, improving robustness. TE-PINN exhibits slower performance degradation across multi-day forecast horizons and maintains stable predictive behavior across datasets from different latitudes. In comparison with both shallow and deep baseline models, the results indicate that introducing thermodynamic priors substantially improves the accuracy and physical consistency of soil temperature forecasting.

Indexed as

Dissipation constraintsLSTMPhysics-guided lossPhysics-informed neural networksSoil temperature forecastingThermodynamic potential

Identifiers

PMID42115224
PMCPMC13351007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.