ArticleScientific reports2026
Natural compounds for preventing dental caries by evaluating antibacterial and biofilm disrupting effects on Streptococcus mutans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Streptococcus mutans is a major contributor to dental caries, and its biofilm formation is associated with treatment challenges. Therefore, identifying medicinal plants and natural compounds with antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities is important for the development of new therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects of honey, aqueous extracts of sumac and Miswak fruit, royal jelly, lactogum, and silver diamine fluoride (SDF) against S. mutans. The antibacterial effects of the compounds and extracts were evaluated using a well diffusion assay. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution. Biofilm formation was quantified using the crystal violet assay, and metabolic activity was assessed by the MTT assay. Morphology of the biofilms was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additionally, the expression of key genes involved in biofilm formation (gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD) was measured by RT-PCR. The findings indicated that the antibacterial effects of honey, Miswak aqueous extract, sumac fruit extract, and SDF were comparable to chlorhexidine. MICs were 512 mg/mL for honey, 512 mg/mL for sumac fruit extract, 512 mg/mL for royal jelly, and lactogum, with Miswak aqueous extract and SDF showing MICs of 256 mg/mL and 32 mg/mL, respectively. SDF, Miswak aqueous extract, and sumac fruit extract exhibited the strongest anti-biofilm effects, down-regulating gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD expression in S. mutans biofilms. Collectively, these results suggest that honey, Miswak and sumac aqueous extracts, and SDF have notable antibacterial activity against S. mutans and can inhibit biofilm formation through downregulation of gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.