Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115215›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026

Prediction of OncotypeDX recurrence score using hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images.

Shachar Cohen, Gil Shamai, Edmond Sabo, Alexandra Cretu, Iris Barshack, Tal Goldman, Gil Bar-Sela, Alexander T Pearson, Dezheng Huo, Frederick M Howard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shachar Cohen *Taub Faculty of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. shacharcohen@cs.technion.ac.il.
Gil Shamai *Taub Faculty of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. gil.shamai@gmail.com.
Edmond SaboDepartment of Pathology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Alexandra CretuDepartment of Pathology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Iris BarshackDepartment of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Tal GoldmanDepartment of Pathology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Gil Bar-SelaDepartment of Oncology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Alexander T PearsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dezheng HuoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frederick M HowardDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ron KimmelTaub Faculty of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Chen MayerDepartment of Pathology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Funding

Israel Innovation Authority 69997Israel Precision Medicine Partnership program 3864/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OncotypeDX 21-gene assay guides adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, but cost and turnaround time limit access. This study presents a deep learning-based approach for predicting OncotypeDX recurrence scores directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images. Our approach leverages a deep learning foundation model pre-trained on 171,189 slides via self-supervised learning, which is fine-tuned for our task. The model was developed and validated using five independent cohorts, out of which three are external. On the two external cohorts that include OncotypeDX scores, the model achieved an AUC of 0.836 and 0.817, and identified 22% and 16.3% of the patients as low-risk with sensitivity of 0.97 and 0.97 and negative predictive value of 0.97 and 0.96, showing strong generalizability despite variations in staining protocols and imaging devices. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients classified as low-risk by the model had a significantly better prognosis than those classified as high-risk, with a hazard ratio of 4.1 (P < 0.001) and 2.0 (P < 0.01) on the two external cohorts that include patient outcomes. This artificial intelligence-driven solution offers a rapid, cost-effective, and scalable alternative to genomic testing, with the potential to enhance personalized treatment planning, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Identifiers

PMID42115215
PMCPMC13385769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.