ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating experimental data and machine learning to predict collapse potential of loessic and lacustrine-alluvial soils using suction and SWCC parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of geological characteristics and Soil-Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC) parameters on the collapse potential (CP) of unsaturated soils from loessic and lacustrine-alluvial deposits in Iran. Laboratory experiments-including SWCC determination, suction-controlled modified consolidation tests, and microstructural analyses (SEM and XRF)-were conducted on samples reconstructed to match natural moisture and in-situ density. The results show that matric suction significantly affects compressibility and collapse behavior, with higher suction and Pressure at wettings increasing CP. SEM observations revealed microstructural rearrangements and denser particle packing consistent with hydraulic and mechanical responses, reflecting the influence of depositional environment and mineralogy. To enhance predictive capability, machine learning models were trained on the integrated dataset, with Gradient Boosting achieving the highest predictive performance (R² = 0.859, RMSE = 1.273). Permutation importance analysis identified Pressure at wetting, matric suction, and saturated volumetric water content (θs) as the most influential mechanistic predictors. These findings demonstrate a strong quantitative association between suction-controlled SWCC parameters and collapse potential, indicating that the incorporation of hydraulic variables significantly improves predictive accuracy compared with conventional index-based approaches. The proposed integrated experimental-hydraulic-machine learning framework provides a reliable preliminary tool for collapse assessment and strengthens the mechanistic basis for geotechnical design in unsaturated collapsible soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.