ArticleScientific reports2026
Theoretical mathematical modeling of compulsive social-media use for digital well-being: cumulative engagement and validation dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We develop a continuous-time mathematical framework that formalizes how different demographic groups engage with social-media platforms through validation-driven behavioural dynamics, with explicit relevance to digital well-being (DWB). This work is motivated by growing evidence that algorithmically mediated validation feedback (such as likes, comments, and notifications) can generate persistent reinforcement loops associated with compulsive checking behaviour and adverse mental health outcomes, yet lacks a rigorous dynamical formulation. Existing descriptions of likes, notifications, and algorithmic feedback loops remain largely qualitative; in contrast, we construct a measurable modelling structure that expresses these mechanisms as continuous-time processes influencing attention and engagement. Unlike purely exogenous approaches, the model incorporates endogenous feedback between cumulative engagement and platform-mediated validation exposure, allowing engagement to influence subsequent validation intensity through algorithmic amplification. Instantaneous validation intensity is represented as a demographic-specific function of deviations from baseline expectations, capturing responsiveness to normalized feedback environments. Cumulative engagement evolves through a nonlinear differential system with saturation constraints that model diminishing responsiveness and an exponential memory kernel that captures temporal decay of reinforcement. We further decompose validation intensity into like-driven and notification-driven components, formalizing distinct compulsive tendencies associated with visible metrics and intermittent alerts. The resulting nonlinear system permits equilibrium and stability analysis under demographic heterogeneity and feedback strength. Estimation is formulated within a continuous-time state-space framework using Kalman filtering. While the present study emphasizes theoretical development and simulation-based illustration, the framework is constructed to be empirically estimable from platform data. The model provides a mathematically precise representation of social-media reinforcement dynamics with implications for assessing and mitigating digital well-being risks across generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.