ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-enabled wireless wearable breathing sensor for breathing pattern recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an AI-driven multisensor wearable system for real-time breathing pattern recognition by integrating an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a flex sensor with wireless data connectivity. Three artificial intelligence models-transformer, convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), and histogram gradient boosting (HGB)-were evaluated for breathing pattern recognition across different model complexities (complex, simple, pure) and sensor configurations (IMU , Flex , and combined). The multisensor system combined with AI model was tested with multiple participants. The complex transformer model, trained with focal loss on the combined IMU and flex sensor data, achieved the highest performance, with 93.41% accuracy and a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9919, outperforming all the other models. Multimodal input significantly improved classification accuracy-up to 20% higher than flex sensor models in six-class tasks-while focal loss enhanced robustness, particularly in addressing class imbalance. These results demonstrate the potential of combining wearable sensor fusion with deep learning to enable accurate, noninvasive, and wireless real-time respiratory monitoring, with potential applications in clinical diagnostics, telemedicine, and personalized health tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.