Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NXC736, a novel sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NXC736, a novel sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsNXC736 is a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator, under development as a novel oral treatment for autoimmune diseases. The goals of this study were to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of NXC736 and its active metabolite (NXC736-P) in healthy male participants.
methodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose study was conducted. Six doses (1, 3, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg) were administered in a single-dosing study, and four doses (20, 40, 60, 80 mg BID) were administered in a multiple-dosing study. The safety, PK and PD were evaluated throughout the study.
resultsNXC736 was well tolerated up to 80 mg, twice daily for 14 days. NXC736 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated in a biphasic manner with mean terminal half-lives ranging from 3.92 to 15.96 h; mean terminal half-lives of NXC736-P ranged from 3.35 to 13.50 h. At the steady state, systemic exposures of both NXC736 and NXC736-P increased dose-proportionally and were accumulated up to ~2 times. First-dose heart rate reduction was transient and attenuated with repeated dosing. In multiple dosing study, means of individual maximum percent reductions in absolute lymphocyte counts were 33.69%, 37.93%, 57.98%, 67.77% and 66.60% in the placebo, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID and 80 mg BID, respectively; reductions were dose-dependent up to 60 mg BID and plateaued at higher doses.
conclusionsNXC736 demonstrated a favourable safety profile at doses up to 80 mg, and its PK and PD profiles were considered adequate for further clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.