ArticleRMD open2026
Ultrasound assessment of vertebral ligaments: development and validation of a landmark-based scanning protocol with potential applicability in spondyloarthritis.
Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo provide a comprehensive description of a standardised, landmark-based ultrasound (US) technique for evaluating the lateral costotransverse (LCTL), supraspinous (SSL) and iliolumbar (ILL) ligaments of the thoracolumbar spine and to assess its reliability, feasibility and its potential applicability in spondyloarthritis (SpA).
methodsLCTL, SSL and ILL were examined using US in specimens, followed by dissection to confirm structure location and validate US findings using a standardised anatomic-based and sonoanatomic-based landmark approach. The US technique was subsequently applied in 20 healthy controls (HC), in whom feasibility and inter-rater and intra-rater reliability among four operators with different expertise were assessed. Ligament visualisation was scored as: 0, not visualised; 1, incompletely visualised; 2, perfectly visualised. The technique was tested in three patients with SpA to evaluate its applicability.
resultsAnatomical study confirmed location and landmarks for all three ligaments. 120 ligaments were assessed in two rounds in HC. Visualisation scores ranged from 1 to 2 in 100% LCTL, 99.1% SSL and 85.9% ILL, with score 2 obtained in 69.6% of 960 assessments. Mean examination time decreased from 12'17″ to 10'56″ between rounds, with no significant differences between operators. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement ranged from moderate to high. In patients with SpA, US detected both inflammatory and structural lesions in the three ligament entheses.
conclusionThe proposed standardised US approach allows reliable assessment of LCTL, SSL and ILL. This technique provides a robust and reproducible method for evaluating the ligaments of the thoracolumbar spine and opens a new approach to the US assessment of patients with spinal inflammatory diseases, including SpA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.