ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Municipal intermediate care services in Denmark and Norway: a cross-country comparative analysis.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntermediate care is increasingly used to reduce hospital admissions and support early discharge from hospital. In Denmark and Norway, health reforms have shifted responsibilities from hospitals to municipalities, prompting the development of community-based intermediate care services.
objectiveTo compare how Danish and Norwegian municipalities have organised and implemented municipal intermediate care services.
designA descriptive comparative study based on national legislation, policy documents, research literature and public statistics.
resultsBoth countries have established municipal intermediate care structures centred on service types: acute and non-acute intermediate care. In Denmark, acute intermediate care includes statutory acute care teams and optional acute care beds, whereas Norway provides statutory acute care beds only. Acute services in both countries are regulated by national guidelines and aim to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions. Non-acute intermediate care mainly consists of temporary institutional beds used for early-supported discharge, rehabilitation, recovery, nursing home waiting placements and respite care. These services are less strictly regulated and vary between municipalities. In both countries, intermediate care primarily targets older adults with complex health needs exceeding the capacity of ordinary long-term care services. Differences were observed in referral pathways, clinical capacity and the degree of municipal autonomy, reflecting broader contextual conditions such as geography, governance structures and workforce availability.
conclusionAlthough Denmark and Norway pursue similar policy goals, their organisational models for municipal intermediate care differ. Distinguishing between acute and non-acute intermediate care highlights the importance of adapting service models to local structural and demographic conditions and informs policy development and cross-country learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.