ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2026
Efficient coherence inference on complex time-frequency coefficients using a general linear model.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human forebrain neural synchronization and entrainment to breathing during wakefulness, sleep, and external mechanical ventilation.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStatistical significance testing of neural coherence is essential for distinguishing genuine cross-signal coupling from spurious correlations. Surrogate-based inference-typically using time shifts or phase randomization-is widely used but computationally expensive and produces discrete and sometimes unstable p-values, limiting scalability for large EEG/iEEG datasets. NEW
methodWe introduce a parametric framework based on a general linear model (GLM) applied to complex-valued time-frequency coefficients (e.g., from the demodulated band transform or short-time Fourier transform). A likelihood ratio test provides continuous coherence significance estimates without surrogate resampling.
resultsUsing real respiration traces as a driver and simulated neural signals with Gaussian broadband noise, we performed dense sweeps of ground-truth coherence. The GLM achieved sensitivity comparable to or better than surrogate testing and produced stable continuous p-values. At 80% detection power, the GLM detected coherence at C≈0.16, whereas surrogate testing required C≈0.31, corresponding to an ∼8 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio. Runtime benchmarking showed an ∼190× speed increase over surrogate-based methods. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsCompared with time-shift and phase-randomization surrogates, the GLM provided matched or superior sensitivity while eliminating the permutation floor and dramatically reducing computation, particularly for dense frequency grids and multichannel datasets.
conclusionsGLM-based inference offers a robust, statistically principled, and computationally scalable alternative to surrogate-based coherence testing, enabling efficient analysis across channels, frequencies, and participants in large EEG/iEEG studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.