Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42114625›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2026

Efficient coherence inference on complex time-frequency coefficients using a general linear model.

Md Rakibul Mowla, Sukhbinder Kumar, Ariane E Rhone, Brian J Dlouhy, Christopher K Kovach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Rakibul MowlaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: mdrakibul-mowla@uiowa.edu.
Sukhbinder KumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: sukhbinder-kumar@uiowa.edu.
Ariane E RhoneDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: ariane-rhone@uiowa.edu.
Brian J DlouhyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: brian-dlouhy@uiowa.edu.
Christopher K KovachDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. Electronic address: ckovach@unmc.edu.

Funding

HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
Amygdala modulation of volitional versus automatic breathingK08NS112573 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI DLOUHY, BRIAN J · 2021 to 2025
$925k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS112573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatistical significance testing of neural coherence is essential for distinguishing genuine cross-signal coupling from spurious correlations. Surrogate-based inference-typically using time shifts or phase randomization-is widely used but computationally expensive and produces discrete and sometimes unstable p-values, limiting scalability for large EEG/iEEG datasets. NEW

methodWe introduce a parametric framework based on a general linear model (GLM) applied to complex-valued time-frequency coefficients (e.g., from the demodulated band transform or short-time Fourier transform). A likelihood ratio test provides continuous coherence significance estimates without surrogate resampling.

resultsUsing real respiration traces as a driver and simulated neural signals with Gaussian broadband noise, we performed dense sweeps of ground-truth coherence. The GLM achieved sensitivity comparable to or better than surrogate testing and produced stable continuous p-values. At 80% detection power, the GLM detected coherence at C≈0.16, whereas surrogate testing required C≈0.31, corresponding to an ∼8 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio. Runtime benchmarking showed an ∼190× speed increase over surrogate-based methods. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsCompared with time-shift and phase-randomization surrogates, the GLM provided matched or superior sensitivity while eliminating the permutation floor and dramatically reducing computation, particularly for dense frequency grids and multichannel datasets.

conclusionsGLM-based inference offers a robust, statistically principled, and computationally scalable alternative to surrogate-based coherence testing, enabling efficient analysis across channels, frequencies, and participants in large EEG/iEEG studies.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyModels, NeurologicalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsComputer SimulationFourier AnalysisHumansLinear ModelsRespirationSignal-To-Noise RatioTime FactorsCircular time shiftDemodulated band transform (DBT)General linear model (GLM)Neural coherencePhase randomizationSurrogate testing

Identifiers

PMID42114625
PMCPMC13196732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.