ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
Contusions bias cortical thickness estimates after traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI study.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by both focal and diffuse pathology. Automated cortical thickness estimation is widely used to quantify structural brain changes following TBI; however, the impact of focal pathology such as contusions on cortical thickness estimates in TBI remains unknown.
methodsWe evaluated lesion-induced bias in cortical thickness under three lesion-handling strategies in 86 TRACK-TBI participants with MRI at 2 weeks and 6 months post-injury. Cortical thickness was estimated using the ANTsNetCT longitudinal pipeline with the default pipeline (No Masking), masking lesion voxels from summarization (Atlas Masking), and masking lesion voxels from cortical thickness estimation (Full Masking). Cross-sectional and longitudinal cortical thickness in unilaterally lesioned regions were compared with their contralesional homologues using linear mixed-effects models. The effectiveness of each lesion handling strategy was then evaluated using nonparametric bootstrap analyses to test whether bias was systematically present across all regions.
resultsAt 2 weeks post-injury, six cortical regions demonstrated significant lesion-associated bias. Collectively across all regions, bias was observed in the No Masking and Atlas-Masking approaches. This bias was significantly attenuated in the Fully Masked approach. Longitudinally, the unmasked data also showed significant lesion-related differences in cortical thickness change across multiple temporal and frontal regions, with persistent effects in the Atlas- and Full Masking approaches.
conclusionsContusions appear to introduce cross-sectional and longitudinal bias in cortical thickness estimates, inflating cross-sectional values and potentially exaggerating atrophy longitudinally. Excluding lesion voxels from tissue probability maps attenuates cross-sectional bias, providing a baseline that improves accuracy and interpretation of neuroimaging biomarkers in TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.