Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42114136›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2026

Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Survivors' Return to Work and Well-Being: Qualitative Interview Study.

Sara L Fällman, Katarina Wijk, Anna Efverman, Linda Eklund, Per Fessé, Sven Trygged, Maria Fjell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara L FällmanDepartment of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Gävleborg, 801 76, Sweden, 46 707305930.ORCID 0000-0002-3325-4184
Katarina WijkCentre for Research and Development, Region Gävleborg, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-3520
Anna EfvermanDepartment of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Gävleborg, 801 76, Sweden, 46 707305930.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-3857
Linda EklundDepartment of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Gävleborg, 801 76, Sweden, 46 707305930.ORCID 0009-0004-1483-3254
Per FesséDepartment of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Gävleborg, 801 76, Sweden, 46 707305930.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-2500
Sven TryggedDepartment of Social Work, Criminology, and Public Health Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Gävleborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7028-8247
Maria FjellDepartment of Caring Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Gävleborg, 801 76, Sweden, 46 707305930.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-2483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: About 4 in 10 people in Sweden get cancer during their lifetime, and approximately half of them will be diagnosed during their working life. As cancer survival rates improve, a growing number of individuals face challenges in returning to work following treatment. This increases the demand for effective return-to-work (RTW) strategies. Despite existing rehabilitation frameworks, cancer survivors often encounter barriers to sustainable work reintegration. Objective: This study aimed to investigate stakeholders' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to RTW among cancer survivors, including factors promoting work-related well-being during the RTW process. Methods: During the development phase of a work-oriented rehabilitation intervention, semistructured interviews were conducted, with 25 stakeholders involved in the RTW process: health care professionals (n=12), social insurance officers (n=7), employers (n=5), and an employment service agency officer (n=1). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Five overarching themes were identified that influenced RTW: collaboration and clear division of responsibilities, balancing individual adaptations, reducing structural barriers through support, views and expectations of the individual regarding RTW, and the emotional significance of work. Key facilitators included flexible work arrangements, individualized adaptations, a strong desire to work, and the emotional value of work. Barriers comprised lack of collaboration among stakeholders, particularly the absence of a clear division of responsibilities, as well as structural barriers, such as sick leave bureaucracy and financial obstacles. The role of rehabilitation coordinators was highlighted as pivotal in bridging gaps between stakeholders and ensuring continuity in care. Conclusions: RTW for cancer survivors is a complex, multifactorial process requiring coordinated efforts across health care, insurance, and employment sectors. Enhancing collaboration, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities, and implementing flexible, individualized support structures are essential to facilitating cancer survivors' RTW. Additionally, including a designated coordinator in the process is proposed. More support during the early phase of RTW is necessary to reduce the risk of long-term labor market exclusion. To help cancer survivors' RTW, clear role definitions and shared responsibilities among stakeholders are essential. Flexibility in the RTW process helps individuals reintegrate at their own pace, reduces isolation, and promotes social connection. These are key considerations for future policies and support measures.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsReturn to WorkStakeholder ParticipationAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingQualitative ResearchSwedencancer survivorsrehabilitationreturn to worksickness absencework participation

Identifiers

PMID42114136
PMCPMC13160487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.