Observational studyEuropean stroke journal2026
Sex-based differences in emergency department treatment times for acute ischaemic stroke: evidence from a large Italian cohort.
Observational study in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSex-related disparities in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) care have been widely reported. However, evidence from Italy remains limited. We aimed to evaluate sex differences in access to revascularisation treatments (RTs) and key time performance indicators in a large Italian cohort. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe conducted a single-centre, retrospective, observational study including all adults admitted to the emergency department of a comprehensive stroke centre in Rome between January 2015 and December 2022 for suspected stroke. Clinical and demographic characteristics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, RTs and stroke care time metrics were collected. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models, as well as restricted cubic spline analyses, were used to assess sex-related differences in RTs and time indicators, adjusting for relevant confounders.
resultsWithin the 9167 patients, 44.4% had AIS, and 48.2% were women. Among patients with AIS, women were older (P < .001), had higher NIHSS scores at onset (P < .001), a greater comorbidity burden (P < .001) and higher in-hospital mortality (P = .010). No significant sex differences were observed in intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment administration rates. However, median door-to-needle time was 4 min longer in women than in men (P = .030). After adjustment, female sex was not significantly associated with RT administration or in-hospital mortality, but remained an independent predictor of longer DNT [adjusted β -8.242; 95% CI (-15.453 to -1.031); P = .025]. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsAlthough access to RTs was comparable between sexes, women experienced longer DNT, indicating persistent in-hospital barriers to timely stroke care. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to achieve full equity in AIS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.