ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Generalizable long short-term memory models for beef cattle DMI under grazing.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating individual dry matter intake (DMI) on pasture remains costly, labor-intensive, and episodic. We developed a deployable sequence model to predict daily, per-animal DMI using walk-on scale weights, metered water intake, animal metadata, and publicly available weather. A 3-layer long short-term memory (LSTM) network (hidden size = 256, dropout = 0.20) ingested 7-d windows of engineered covariates, including rolling statistics, first- and second-order differences, short lags, thermal ranges, and temperature-humidity index (THI), scaled with a RobustScaler; categorical variables were encoded with learned embeddings. The prediction head was a compact multilayer perceptron, and outputs were inverse Box-Cox transformed to kilograms per day. Training used animal-identity-grouped splits, Huber loss, Adam optimization with gradient clipping, learning-rate scheduling, early stopping, and Optuna hyperparameter tuning. A single feature-scaler bundle was evaluated against National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) equations and three strictly held-out external validations: regional drylot (Morgantown, WV), non-regional drylot (Hyplains, KS), and grazing (2023 Wardensville, WV). Using identical evaluation masks, the LSTM improved accuracy relative to NASEM (pooled RMSE 1.329 vs. 1.858 kg/d; R2 0.655 vs. 0.326), with the largest gains in grazing (LSTM RMSE 1.180, R2 0.507; NASEM RMSE 3.883, R2 -4.337). Iterative fine-tuning with a frozen encoder showed stable behavior under bias-only head updates across production systems. These results demonstrate that accurate, generalizable DMI prediction can be achieved from pragmatic inputs, enabling scalable evaluation of intake phenotypes and feed-efficiency traits directly in grazing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.