SynthesisEuropean journal of orthodontics2026
The effect of eruption guidance appliances on occlusal traits: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly treatment of malocclusion in primary and early mixed dentition is often carried out by dentists under the supervision of orthodontists. In these treatments, simple appliances are preferred.
objectivesTo analyse which occlusal traits can be corrected with prefabricated eruption guidance appliances (EGAs) in mixed dentitions. SEARCH
methodsArticles written in English and published between January 1990 and March 2023 were searched from Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, LILAC, PubMed, and Scopus. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were formed according to the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design schema (PICOS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Selection of the articles followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. The pooled estimates for the change in clinical and cephalometric measurements were calculated. The overall quality of the outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.
resultsSeven articles with 277 patients and 219 controls were included. One was a randomized controlled trial, one was a retrospective study, and three were prospective treatment studies. Two follow-up studies analysed cephalometric data of already included studies. Four prefabricated appliances were used: Education Fonctionnelle, LM-Activator™, Nite-Guide®, and Occlus-o-Guide®. Treatment protocols varied from passive night-time use to combinations of active daytime and passive night-time use. Treatment periods varied from 10 months to 3.3 years. The main findings were reductions in overjet (range 1.1-2.3 mm) and overbite (range 0.6-2.0 mm). Other findings included improvement in crowding and molar relationship and better tooth-to-tooth contacts. Even though most of the changes were dental, significant increases in the length of the mandible were reported in two studies. Four studies were included in the meta-analyses. In these analyses, the changes in overjet, overbite, SNB, and ANB were found statistically significant.
conclusionsEGAs comprise a group of functional appliances suitable for reduction of excessive overjet and overbite in mixed dentition. However, more studies are needed to elucidate their effects on skeletal structures. REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was registered at PROSPERO under the ID CRD42023441197.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.