ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Experimental protothecosis in a murine model.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prototheca spp. are unicellular, yeast-like microalgae, and the only plant lineage known to cause opportunistic infections in vertebrates, including humans. The aim of the study was to establish a comprehensive murine model of protothecosis to systematically investigate the influence of Prototheca species, inoculum dose, infection route, and host immune status on disease development and severity. Three pathogenic (P. wickerhamii, P. bovis, P. ciferrii) and one saprophytic (P. stagnora) species were used to infect immunocompetent or athymic mice. A total of 324 animals were split into 54 groups according to inoculum size (10⁶ or 10⁷) and infection route (subcutaneous, intramammary, or intraperitoneal). Six weeks post-infection, mice were euthanized, and organs were collected for microbiological and histopathological analyses. All four Prototheca species produced infection in mice, yet the infection potential differed considerably between the species. P. ciferrii exhibited the highest infection rate (61.1%), followed by P. bovis (45.8%) and P. wickerhamii (31.9%), whereas P. stagnora was the least virulent (11.1%). Athymic mice were markedly more susceptible compared to wt mice (45.1% vs. 29.9%) and more prone to develop multifocal infections. Higher inocula (10⁷) increased infection yield, while the inoculation route influenced the infection site but not its severity. In the cytokine profile, IL-10 and TNF-α were most prominently elevated, with significantly higher levels in wt than in athymic mice. This study highlights three hallmarks of protothecal disease: a species-specific infection pattern, chronic, asymptomatic infection as the clinical manifestation, and the essential role of host immunity in determining disease trajectory and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.