Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42113843›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Understanding teamwork experiences of neurodivergent students: A phenomenological exploration of conflict and collaboration in engineering teams.

McKenna P Sperry, Thomas A O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

McKenna P SperryDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6686-6845
Thomas A O'NeillDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodivergent individuals have been systematically excluded from employment opportunities, meaning that we know little about lived experiences within neurodiverse teams. To fill this gap, the current phenomenological study seeks to understand the teamwork experiences of neurodivergent students at the University of Calgary. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students in the faculty of engineering who self-identify as neurodivergent, exploring their perceptions and experiences of teamwork and conflict. We grouped the themes that emerged from the interview data into cognitive and behavioural dimensions to represent what neurodivergent students think and do as they face and manage challenges and opportunities within team settings. Together, the themes highlight that students' desire to be understood and recognized by others significantly influences their team interactions. These findings suggest that traditional theories attempting to explain the social elements of neurodivergence are limited in their capacity to capture the nuanced ways in which neurodivergent individuals seek to understand and relate to others, particularly in team contexts. Finally, this study translates students' insights into recommendations for educators to create more supportive and inclusive teamwork environments in courses.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorEngineeringStudentsFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID42113843
PMCPMC13160356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.