ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Assessing compliance with smoke-free laws in Purbakhola Rural Municipality, Nepal: A cross-sectional observational study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite Nepal's comprehensive tobacco control legislation, evidence on its implementation at the local level, particularly in rural areas, remains limited. This study assessed compliance with smoke-free laws in public places of Purbakhola Rural Municipality, Palpa, Nepal. A cross-sectional observational survey was conducted from May 7 to May 16, 2025, across all six wards of the municipality. We assessed 219 public places from 11 categories. Compliance with smoke-free provisions was measured using an adapted observational checklist covering six indicators: active smoking, no-smoking signage, designated smoking areas, ashtrays, cigarette butt litter and tobacco advertisement. Descriptive statistics estimated compliance and exploratory logistic regression examined associations between observed active smoking and environmental factors, including the presence of ashtrays and no-smoking signage. Compliance with smoke-free provisions was high in public institutional settings, including health facilities (100.0%), educational institutions (100.0%), and government offices (88.8-100.0%). In contrast, substantial non-compliance was observed in the hospitality sector, where only 45.0% of restaurants were free from indoor smoking and 37.5% had no visible ashtrays. A critical gap was the lack of systemic compliant no-smoking signage, even in high-compliance settings, with 54.5% of health facilities non-compliant indoors and 100.0% of government offices non-compliant outdoors. The presence of ashtrays was the strongest predictor of smoking, with indoor ashtrays associated with dramatically higher odds of observed smoking. In contrast, no statistically significant association was found for signage, although no smoking was observed in venues with indoor signage. There is a significant implementation gap in smoke-free law compliance particularly in the hospitality sector. The findings underscore the urgent need for strengthening enforcement, ensuring the removal of ashtrays-a major environmental cue for smoking-and promoting the universal installation of standardized no-smoking signage to align practice with policy and protect public from secondhand smoke.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.