ArticlePloS one2026
Extracting user profile via large language models and ontologies.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracting user-specific profiles that include general personal information, such as hobbies, occupation, or age, is a valuable asset for systems like recommendation engines or personalized chatbots. Currently, most approaches moved toward exploiting the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) on rich languages while less-resourced languages still present significant opportunities for exploration and improvement. In this research, we present a multi-step approach for profile extraction from dialogue systems in Persian as a use case. Through an extensive set of experiments and analyses on various models, we show that LLMs struggle with these languages due to limited language-specific resources and complex linguistic structures. To address this, we propose a hybrid method that combines techniques such as slot filling, in-context learning, and ontology-based inference. Our final results demonstrate a significant improvement over current state-of-the-art models, including LLMs with few-shot examples and even their fine-tuned version. Our method achieves an F-score of 90.46, outperforming GPT-4o and Llama-3-70B by an absolute difference of 17.08 and 24.51 respectively. Our system can also detect inconsistencies in presented information in which our performance substantially exceeds the best performance of GPT-4o and Llama-3-70B with an accuracy of 92%. It is 21% absolutely better than GPT-4o and 47% better than Llama.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.