Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42113772›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data.

Leo Joskowicz, Tim Buchbinder, Eldan Chodorov, Assaf Hoogi, Katherine Matos, Antonio Rivera, Dror Sharon, Eyal Banin, Jaime Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leo JoskowiczSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tim BuchbinderSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eldan ChodorovSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Assaf HoogiSchool of Computer Science, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel,‌‌.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-6254
Katherine MatosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Antonio RiveraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dror SharonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eyal BaninDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jaime LevyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0043-4354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate a novel image-based deep learning method for the automated identification of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and to explore the feasibility of predicting selected causative gene groups using a multimodal analysis of wide-field fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and pseudocolor fundus (pCF) images.

designThe method was evaluated using a retrospective dataset of patient studies containing FAF and pCF images, as well as genetic tests for IRD.

participantsPatients with confirmed IRD for which both wide-field FAF and pCF images and genetic tests for IRD performed at Hadassah University Medical Center were included. The dataset consisted of 409 patients (330 patients with IRD with the 25 most commonly affected genes in our population and patients without IRD, and 79 patients without IRD).

methodsNine EfficientNet-V2-m convolutional neural networks were trained for the following three classification tasks: a binary IRD vs. non-IRD classification, and classification into two groups of five causative genes (Groups 1 and 2). For each task, three models were trained on the FAF images only, the pCF images only, and both the FAF and pCF images. The performance of the models was then evaluated and compared using 5-fold cross-validation.

main outcome measuresAccuracy, precision, F1 scores, AUC, and confusion matrices.

resultsThe multimodal classification models that were trained on both the FAF and pCF images yielded the best results. The binary classification model had a mean (±SD) accuracy of 0.95 ± 0.01, a mean precision of 0.92 ± 0.01, and a mean F1 score of 0.90 ± 0.02. The Group 1 classification model had a mean accuracy of 0.92 ± 0.03, a mean precision of 0.93 ± 0.03, and a mean F1 score of 0.89 ± 0.03. Finally, the Group 2 classification model had a mean accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.03, a mean precision of 0.87 ± 0.04, and a mean F1 score of 0.83 ± 0.04.

conclusionsOur results indicate that determining whether a patient has IRD can be performed with high accuracy within this retrospective cohort based on FAF and pCF images using image-based deep learning classifiers. This image-based approach may assist clinicians during the patient's initial visit by providing decision support prior to genetic testing. It may also help prioritize patients for genetic workup, particularly in settings in which genetic testing is not readily available. Further prospective and external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetinaRetinal DiseasesConvolutional Neural NetworksFundus OculiHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptical ImagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42113772
PMCPMC13160341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.