Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42113710›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Assessing Trade-Offs in Climate Impacts across Various Circular Economy Strategies for Japan's Battery Industry.

Ziyan He, Guochang Xu, Stephen Northey, Xin Sun, Minoru Fujii, Kenichi Nakajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ziyan HeMaterial Cycles Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-3441-0051
Guochang XuMaterial Cycles Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1509-4666
Stephen NortheyInstitute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-8842
Xin SunIntegrated Research on Energy, Environment and Society, Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747AG, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-8623
Minoru FujiiSocial Systems Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-5115
Kenichi NakajimaMaterial Cycles Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-7695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular strategies, such as extending in-use lifetimes, reuse, and recycling, are recognized as efficient ways to mitigate the climate impacts associated with lithium-ion battery demand. However, these strategies come with trade-offs, as extending lifetime through continued use in vehicles or through reuse in battery energy storage systems (BESS) delays recycling and secondary material supply. While recycling regulations with mandatory warranty periods accelerate material recovery, they may sacrifice carbon benefits from prolonged use. Focusing on Japan, we develop a dynamic assessment framework that combines stock-driven material flow analysis with life-cycle-based greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting to evaluate these trade-offs under time-evolving vehicle battery and solar/wind BESS demand and time-varying GHG emission factors. Our analysis indicates that, under the current warranty (8-year) lifetime scenario, the generation of reusable electric vehicle batteries is projected to reach 225 GWh by 2050, sufficient to meet most energy storage demand. Despite the trade-offs, implementing both reuse and recycling reduces cumulative battery emissions by 20-30% compared with scenarios that use only one strategy. In the early stage (2022-2035), compared with reuse in BESS and recycling, extending battery lifetime in electric vehicles can yield greater emissions-reduction benefits. These findings highlight the need for adaptive policies to optimize circularity in battery systems.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesClimateGreenhouse EffectGreenhouse GasesJapanRecyclingGreenhouse Gasesbattery energy storage systemselectric vehiclesextending lifetimegreenhouse gas emissionsrecyclingreuse

Identifiers

PMID42113710
PMCPMC13235548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.