ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Assessing Trade-Offs in Climate Impacts across Various Circular Economy Strategies for Japan's Battery Industry.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circular strategies, such as extending in-use lifetimes, reuse, and recycling, are recognized as efficient ways to mitigate the climate impacts associated with lithium-ion battery demand. However, these strategies come with trade-offs, as extending lifetime through continued use in vehicles or through reuse in battery energy storage systems (BESS) delays recycling and secondary material supply. While recycling regulations with mandatory warranty periods accelerate material recovery, they may sacrifice carbon benefits from prolonged use. Focusing on Japan, we develop a dynamic assessment framework that combines stock-driven material flow analysis with life-cycle-based greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting to evaluate these trade-offs under time-evolving vehicle battery and solar/wind BESS demand and time-varying GHG emission factors. Our analysis indicates that, under the current warranty (8-year) lifetime scenario, the generation of reusable electric vehicle batteries is projected to reach 225 GWh by 2050, sufficient to meet most energy storage demand. Despite the trade-offs, implementing both reuse and recycling reduces cumulative battery emissions by 20-30% compared with scenarios that use only one strategy. In the early stage (2022-2035), compared with reuse in BESS and recycling, extending battery lifetime in electric vehicles can yield greater emissions-reduction benefits. These findings highlight the need for adaptive policies to optimize circularity in battery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.