SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2026
Eimeria spp. in Cattle: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Eimeria spp. in Cattle: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infections in Local and Cross-Border Cattle in Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eimeria spp. are major protozoan parasites of cattle, causing coccidiosis with substantial economic and animal health impacts worldwide. This study systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the global prevalence, species distribution and associated risk factors of Eimeria spp. in cattle. Various international databases were searched from inception to 16 April 2025. Eligible studies reported extractable prevalence data for naturally infected cattle. Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed by I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.