Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42113476›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2026

Sign language ideologies in deaf education in Trinidad and Tobago.

Ian Dhanoolal, Kristin Snoddon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian DhanoolalDeaf Empowerment and Advancement Foundation, Trinidad and Tobago.
Kristin SnoddonSchool of Early Childhood Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-5381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper, representing a multilingual Global South-Global North deaf research collaboration, reports and critically analyzes findings from interviews with 5 deaf adult and 5 sign language interpreter participants regarding their educational and training experiences in the postcolonial Caribbean environment of Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean sign languages are frequently said to be varieties of American Sign Language (ASL) and/or to have been displaced by ASL in schools with deaf learners. In the anglophone Caribbean context, deaf children have not had access to early childhood care and education in the medium of sign language, and most deaf students arrive at primary school without having acquired a named sign language variety. Moreover, despite a lack of formal standards for interpreter training and evaluation, deaf secondary school students are placed in regular schools with sign language interpreters. Findings from interviews reveal ideologies surrounding named sign language varieties, deaf multilingualism, and interpreter roles within schools, and point to the need for deaf leadership within organizations and institutions providing services to deaf people.

Indexed as

DeafnessEducation of Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSign LanguageAdultChildDeaf CultureHumansMedical InterpretingMultilingualismTrinidad and Tobago

Identifiers

PMID42113476
PMCPMC13595094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.