ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
A risk-based framework to support conversion decision-making during minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: results from a multicentre registry.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP) is increasingly adopted worldwide, but conversion to open surgery still occurs and is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Tools to identify patients at increased risk of conversion are limited. This multicentre registry-based study included patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLP) or robot-assisted (RLP) MILP within the IGOMIPS registry. Predictors of conversion were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. A simple preoperative risk score, the modified Conversion Risk Score (mCRS), was derived from independent predictors of conversion. We explored the interaction between preoperative risk, intraoperative complexity, and center-level variability. Of the 2127 MILPs included, 1235 (58.1%) were performed laparoscopically, and 892 (42.9%) were robot-assisted. Conversion occurred in 180 cases (8.5%) and was more frequent during LLP than RLP (11.8% vs 3.8%). Age ≥ 61 years, tumour diameter ≥ 35 mm, and preoperative suspicion of pancreatic malignancy were independently associated with conversion and formed the mCRS (range 0-5). Conversion rates increased progressively with higher mCRS values (ranging from 3.5% to 20.6%). When a high preoperative risk was combined with intraoperative complexity, the probability of conversion increased further (up to 19%). Differences in conversion rates between centres were primarily explained by case volume. In this large multicentre cohort, conversion during MILP was associated with patient age, tumour size, and suspected malignancy. The proposed mCRS, combined with intraoperative cues, may support risk stratification and timely intraoperative decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.