ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Ensemble learning-guided discovery of anti-tuberculosis phytochemicals: computational prediction and mechanistic insights.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge driven by persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and increasing drug resistance. Phytochemicals represent a structurally diverse and underexplored chemical space for anti-TB drug discovery, yet systematic prioritization strategies integrating machine learning and structure-based validation are limited. A curated phenotypic anti-TB dataset of 425,180 compounds was used to train ensemble ExtraTrees models based on ECFP4 fingerprints and physicochemical descriptors. The models achieved strong predictive performance (ROC-AUC up to 0.983; MCC up to 0.871). SHAP analysis enabled mechanistic interpretation by identifying the key molecular descriptors and fingerprint features driving anti-TB activity predictions. The validated ensemble was applied to screen 4707 phytochemicals, yielding 3209 predicted actives, of which 778 satisfied applicability domain criteria. High-confidence candidates were subsequently evaluated by molecular docking against twelve structurally validated essential M. tuberculosis targets spanning cell wall biosynthesis, energy metabolism, nucleotide synthesis, and cofactor pathways. Docking analysis identified 486 phytochemicals with favorable predicted binding affinities, including 193 compounds exhibiting multi-target engagement. Several top-ranked candidates reproduced canonical interaction patterns of co-crystallized inhibitors, supporting mechanistic plausibility. This integrated chemoinformatics and structure-based framework enables robust prioritization of phytochemicals with biologically meaningful and multi-target antitubercular potential. The study provides a computationally grounded strategy for accelerating lead identification against drug-resistant TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42113380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.