ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Heads and tails of individual differences: the role of environmental complexity in cognitive development of juvenile lobsters.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experiencing environmental complexity during early life is fundamental for vertebrate neural development, with profound and often irreversible effects on later behavioural and cognitive outcomes. However, studies on the early stages of invertebrate development are scanty. European lobsters (Homarus gammarus) are routinely reared in captivity for subsequent release in the context of restocking and stock-enhancement. The impoverished captive conditions they experience may exert long-term effects on their development, ultimately impairing their success after release. Here we tested the effects of environmental complexity during early life on learning (N = 38) and personality (N = 132) of juvenile lobsters. Lobsters experienced a full enrichment (with both substrate and shelter), a partial enrichment (either substrate or shelter), or bare standard conditions as a control. We assessed lobsters' exploration and activity patterns via repeated open field tests, quantified their learning in a double T-maze, and investigated the possible presence of a speed-accuracy/flexibility trade-off in decision-making. We found that juvenile lobsters raised in enriched environments were more active compared to lobsters raised in control conditions. They were also faster in taking decisions and in correcting erroneous ones compared to controls, while decision speed did not predict the accuracy of its outcome. Finally, while all lobsters reached the learning criterion, the effects of environmental treatment on learning speed were only detectable in individuals that developed a wild-type morphological phenotype (i.e. asymmetrical claws), who showed a higher information-seeking tendency and required more trials. Overall, these results indicate a key role of early-life experience of environmental complexity in the development of behavioural and cognitive traits that can drive success in the wild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.