ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Learning about the genetic risk in my family: Preferences of Italian nurses.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores Italian nurses' preferences and views regarding the disclosure and sharing of genetic risk information within families, focusing on their genetic literacy and responsibility, and comparing these perspectives with laypeople. A nested cross-sectional online survey, originally designed for the general population, included three hypothetical scenarios of inherited genetic risk (Cystic Fibrosis, Hereditary Cancer Syndromes, and early-onset Alzheimer's disease) and items assessing genetic literacy (awareness), family cohesion, disclosure preferences, and responsibility. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially, and qualitative responses were analyzed inductively using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Among the 1,302 respondents, 501 were healthcare professionals (HCPs), including 315 nurses. Their genetic literacy was modest (mean 2.5/4), higher than laypeople's, with no differences by age or education. Nearly all (94.9%) wished to be informed of genetic risk for at least one condition, with 75.9% preferring to be informed for all three, similar to laypeople (78.1%). Most (97.8%) would undergo genetic testing if informed (95.6% of laypeople). Responsibility for disclosure was viewed as shared between relatives and HCPs (39.1%) or by everyone involved (themselves, relatives and HCPs) (25.1%), echoing laypeople's views. Qualitative findings from the few who did not wish to be informed (n = 16) emphasized anxiety, psychological self-protection, and scepticism toward predictive medicine, similar to laypeople. Italian nurses expressed views and preferences similar to laypeople. While they valued receiving genetic risk information and HCP involvement in family communication, limited familiarity with clinical applications of genetic testing highlights a gap in nursing education and practice, with implications for targeted training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.